Comprehensive Compliance Solutions

    NATA Compliance Services Blog

    Best Practices and Warnings for DOT Random Drug and Alcohol Testing (Part 1)

    Posted by Judy Boyle on Thu, June 6, 2013

    Just entering the transportation industry Keep your Random Drug and Alcohol Program in the best shape possibleor new to the Drug/Alcohol Program Manager (DER) position? Over the course of this month, we will be giving you some best practices and warnings to help you with your Department of Transportation (DOT) Random Drug and Alcohol Testing Program.


    If you are new to Federal Aviation Administration (FAA)/DOT drug and alcohol testing programs, you may wonder why even test at all. Testing is a great tool for employers for a variety of reasons, including the following:

    • Deters drug and alcohol use in the workplace
    • Saves lives and prevents injuries
    • Allows an employee to easily say no to illegal drug use because of the testing done at their work
    • Reduces employer liability
    • Helps identify and facilitate treatment for those who are using or abusing.

    Additionally, random testing is the most “fair” way to test. So, now that you know why testing is a good idea, let’s next quickly cover who needs to be tested.

    Regardless of job titles, people should be tested based on their job function. If an employee preforms a safety-sensitive function, regardless of his or her title (the president, a supervisor, a volunteer, or a contract worker), he or she should be in the pool of people that can randomly be selected to test. If your operation has two parts, a DOT and a non-DOT part, then only employees preforming DOT safety-sensitive functions should be in your DOT random pool. This DOT random pool should be kept distinctly separate from your private company or non-DOT testing program. The pools are also completely separate. You will want to make sure that you keep these lists up to date. A best practice is just before preforming a random selection, refresh the pool to include all safety-sensitive employees subject to DOT random testing, excluding those not subject to random testing and who may no longer be with the company.

    Now you should know who gets tested. Next, you will want to know how to select employees. Random drug testing should be just that—random. As a warning, random draws made by randomly picking numbers are not acceptable random test selection practices. These methods are all easily influenced, consciously or unconsciously, by the people involved. You will want to ensure that you are using scientifically valid methods of selecting employees from testing. Random number tables or computer-based random number generators, traceable to a specific employee, are all acceptable. Your third-party administrator (TPA) should be able to let you know how they select random tests from your pool so that you can ensure it is valid.

    In the end, you want to ensure that everybody in the pool must have an equal chance of being chosen and tested in each selection period.

    Return for Part 2 of this series on June 11!

    Tags: Airport, Fixed Base Operator, Aircraft Operator, Operation, Anti-Drug & Alcohol Program Management, Blog, Aircraft Repair, Maintenance Operator, Anti-Drug & Alcohol Program Manager

    Subscribe via Email

    Client Testimonials

    "I have to say that using NATA is the the best decision I have made in starting and running our 135 Dept. Early on Emily and the entire group never got tired of my endless questions! *Not that they showed anyway;-). We use them for EVERYTHING, starting at PRIA, Drug Program, Records Storage, all the way thru Audit Prep and just answering all my questions. I seriously could not do this without them. Even when my rep Emily is busy, I can rely on Claudia, or Dan for immediate help. The service we receive is well worth what we pay and then some!!"

    Shellie Foster

    - Charter Director

    Clemens Aviation LLC
    I got a gold star from the TSA inspector who inspected our flight school last year, but that's because my company paid me ground time to research AFSP and make a new AFSP student checklist. Even so, I had one (of 3) AFSP applicants rejected initially due to some of the errors you talk about in the blog. I just wanted to shoot you an email and say thanks for making the effort to clarify the process for all of us. I get the impression that there are a lot of the CFIs out there in the small flight schools who haven't got a clue about the AFSP process. So go ahead and feel good about yourself for helping all us lost boys stay in business and out of the trouble.


    - The CFI