Comprehensive Compliance Solutions

    NATA Compliance Services Blog

    Does Your Drug and Alcohol Policy Change with Medical Marijuana Authorization?

    Posted by Brenda Stoltz on Thu, January 8, 2015

    marijuana

    It seems that with every election of late, more and more states vote to decriminalize medical or recreational marijuana. Twenty-three states and the District of Columbia have voted to legalize some use of marijuana for medical purposes or, in the case of four states, recreationally. These recent changes in state laws are throwing employers, including aircraft operators, into uncharted territory, given the fact that the federal government still classifies the drug as a Schedule I controlled substance that is illegal to use.

    Despite this classification, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) issued a memo in 2008, and again in 2013, that federal government resources would not be focused on those individuals complying with state marijuana laws. To help shed some light on the issue, let’s review how these recently passed state laws affect your drug and alcohol policy.


    Is It Legal For Airline Employees to Use Marijuana or Not?

    In a word; no. While the 23 states have legalized some level of marijuana use, the federal government still considers it an illegal substance. Several federal regulations, in fact, explicitly ban the use of the drug altogether.

    • The Controlled Substances Act of 1970 bars the cultivation, possession, use or distribution of marijuana. In 2005, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the federal government had the right to enforce the Controlled Substances Act even in states where medical marijuana use is legal. While the DOJ’s memos of ’08 and ’13 stated that they would not actively prosecute individuals, the Supreme Court’s ruling upholds the government’s right to do so.
    • The Department of Labor’s Drug-Free Workplace Act of 1998 requires that those organizations with federal contracts worth $100,000 or more are required to “make an ongoing, good faith effort to maintain a drug-free workplace.”
    • The Omnibus Transportation Employee Testing Act of 1991 requires drug and alcohol testing of transportation employees who hold safety-sensitive jobs, including pilots. As part of this mandate, the Department of Transportation’s (DOT) Office of Drug and Alcohol Policy and Compliance states that marijuana use is unacceptable for those with safety-sensitive jobs and therefore subject to DOT drug testing.
    • The Occupational Safety and Health Administration’s (OSHA) General Duty Clause requires employers to maintain workplaces free from recognized hazards, such as alcohol and drugs.

    For those looking for further clarification, Jim Swart, DOT’s Director of Drug and Alcohol Policy and Compliance issued a Medical Marijuana Notice in 2009 to remove any equivocation about DOT’s stance towards marijuana usage. According to the notice, Swart states that it is unacceptable, regardless of the laws of any state and any “valid medical explanation for a transportation employee’s positive drug test result.” Swart continues, “It remains unacceptable for any safety-sensitive employee subject to drug testing under the Department of Transportation’s drug testing regulations to use marijuana.”

    The future of marijuana seems to be directed towards legalization. According to some experts, seven other states are poised to decriminalize the drug in the coming elections. If any additional states legalize marijuana use, more than half of the states in the country would see marijuana legalized.

    Still, there are no plans to change marijuana’s classification or legal standing on a federal level. Yet even if the drug’s status does change nationally, it is unlikely to change an operator’s obligation to ban its use among pilots and others in safety-sensitive positions, as it would likely be regulated like alcohol and other controlled substances. And that kind of assurance should offer some guidance for operators today and in the future.

    Free Drug and Alcohol Program Webinar! Learn more about what we can do for you as your TPA!  

     

    Tags: Drug and Alcohol

    Subscribe via Email

    Client Testimonials

    "I have to say that using NATA is the the best decision I have made in starting and running our 135 Dept. Early on Emily and the entire group never got tired of my endless questions! *Not that they showed anyway;-). We use them for EVERYTHING, starting at PRIA, Drug Program, Records Storage, all the way thru Audit Prep and just answering all my questions. I seriously could not do this without them. Even when my rep Emily is busy, I can rely on Claudia, or Dan for immediate help. The service we receive is well worth what we pay and then some!!"

    Shellie Foster

    - Charter Director

    Clemens Aviation LLC
    I got a gold star from the TSA inspector who inspected our flight school last year, but that's because my company paid me ground time to research AFSP and make a new AFSP student checklist. Even so, I had one (of 3) AFSP applicants rejected initially due to some of the errors you talk about in the blog. I just wanted to shoot you an email and say thanks for making the effort to clarify the process for all of us. I get the impression that there are a lot of the CFIs out there in the small flight schools who haven't got a clue about the AFSP process. So go ahead and feel good about yourself for helping all us lost boys stay in business and out of the trouble.

    Patrick

    - The CFI